Julia
Serano, author of Whipping Girl,
grasped my attention when she pointed out certain problems pertaining to trans
women caused by pseudofeminists. Serano herself is a trans women; someone “who
was assigned a male sex at birth, but who identifies as and/or lives as a
women” (11). She has experienced firsthand discrimination from being a sexual
minority, and was shocked about how much of this was coming from women who
claim to be feminists. Serano is setting out to try and put an end to the
degradation of trans women, and I think a huge part of this movement involves
the need for feminism to progress even further. It is most likely very
difficult already for a trans woman to come out and openly identify as a women,
but without the support of other people it can be nearly impossible for some.
About a year ago I read the book She’s Not There by Jennifer Finney
Boylan. This book was one of the first things to really open my eyes to what
transgender means. Like Whipping Girl,
it was written by a transsexual about the difficulty of her situation and how
people reacted to her transformation. To anyone who does not know much about
what it means to be transgender or who is quick to dismiss transgender individuals
as being legitimate, this book can really change one’s mind. The problem with
transgender discrimination is that people do not understand the issue and
cannot relate, but hearing a real life example in this way makes a huge
difference. In the book Jennifer talks about when and how she realized that she
did not feel right as a boy and instead identified as a female. She was already
married with children by the time she came out, although she secretly
identified as a girl since she was just a kid. She shows how people treated her
different when she came out, and how many did not quite understand why she
changed her sex. Seeing all the hatred Jennifer experienced made me realize how
in the dark most people are about transgender individuals.
In discussion of transgender
individuals, Serano brought up the term oppositional sexism, or “the belief
that female and male are rigid, mutually exclusive categories” (13). Simply
put, it says that men and women are opposites. This type of sexism leaves out
anyone who does not exactly match the definitions of feminine or masculine, especially
gays, lesbians, transgender people, and so on. This is an interesting concept
to me because although I was assigned as a female at birth and still identify
as one, I do not feel that I fit the definition of feminine. A large portion of
my wardrobe is made up of men’s clothing, and I do not always act proper and
submissive like many people expect of a woman. It goes to show that there are
no set characteristics unique to only men or women, but that either gender can
have any variety of feminine and masculine traits. Putting an end to
oppositional sexism is something that the feminist movement is making progess
in doing.
For a while I have been thinking
about what it really means to be a feminist, so when I read parts of Whipping Girl, I felt like my questions
were brought to the surface. I often hear people saying that feminists hate men
but also look down on women who appear too feminine. After reading portions of
Whipping Girl I came to relate this definition with the term ‘pseudofeminism’. So
what is feminism really? I found Bell Hooks to have the clearest and most concise
definition for this term. She claimed that “feminism is a movement to end
sexism, sexual exploitation and oppression”. Feminists should not only support
women who were assigned as female at birth and have continuously
self-identified as female. Anyone who is against sexism, regardless of how
feminine or masculine they appear or what gender they identify as, has the
support of true feminists.
Feminists
have made huge progress since the movement began. Especially in the past few
years we hear more and more about feminism. In fact, just this past weekend
Emma Watson delivered a speech on her feminist theory at the United Nations. The video I included above is just a brief segment of the speech, the whole speech and pictures can be found here. Watson
is a well-known actress from the Harry Potter series, and a role model for
many. What people do not usually know is that she is also a UN Women Goodwill
Ambassador. In her speech she focuses on gender equality and shows that
feminists are not man haters, but rather that they want to include men in the
feminist movement. She discusses the idea of oppositional sexism in her own
words by saying that men and women do not have distinct and opposite traits,
using as example from her childhood of how she was assertive and in control, a
trait general associated with masculinity. Watson wants to truly make a change
in how feminism is poorly viewed, as well as show how important gender equality
is. What
this new view of feminism shows us is the no matter the gender, we should all
be equal. If we take this to heart then we can end the misery for most transgender
individuals, and allow for them to be openly accepted in society. We can also put an end to the bad reputation surrounding feminism by including every individual no matter what their gender identity.
I'll have to read She's Not There. It sounds really good! I'm glad we're talking about feminine discrimination from the feminists. It's easy to say that masculine traits are OK/good for everyone to have when they're held up as the best traits in our society as a whole! It's much more of a stretch to acknowledge that femininity can also be powerful and wonderful. I think it's absolutely necessary that we critique feminism as well as fighting for it. There's always room for improvement!
ReplyDelete